Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| chew [2019/01/17 18:27] – yair | chew [2019/01/18 23:27] (current) – yair | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | "Bone conduction is not a new discovery. \\ | ||
| + | Ludwig Van Beethoven overcame deafness by biting a metal rod attached to his piano to hear his work." [[https:// | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | can we use bone conduction to pick up chewing sounds and can we process and categorize them into something | ||
| - | < | + | === recording techniques === |
| - | Ludwig Van Beethoven overcame deafness by biting a metal rod attached to his piano to hear his work." [[https:// | + | we found several different methods of recording chewing sounds. listed below |
| + | < | ||
| + | conducted through the bone. A specially designed 0.0005 in. thick stainless steel needle | ||
| + | mounted on a phonograph cartridge (Figure 1) was found to be most reliable for | ||
| + | picking up vibrations from bony surfaces while a subject chewed a standard portion | ||
| + | of a test food for 10 strokes. The signal was fed through an amplifier and recorded | ||
| + | on a in. magnetic tape in a tape recorder* run at a speed of 3¾ inch per sec. The sounds | ||
| + | were also monitored with earphones by the investigator. \\ | ||
| + | [...]\\ | ||
| + | Three bony areas (center of the forehead, mastoid process and lower border of the mandible towards its angle) were | ||
| + | chosen to establish, if possible, a single satisfactory and reliable landmark for picking | ||
| + | up chewing sounds. The pick-up needle was gently pushed through the skin to rest | ||
| + | on the bony surface at a point that was free of muscle attachment and had a relatively | ||
| + | thin tissue cover. This point was established by palpating the area while the subject | ||
| + | was asked to clench his teeth and relax. The pick-up device was held in place with a | ||
| + | rubber cuff. The sounds were recorded separately from each of the three sites while | ||
| + | the subject chewed a 3 g portion of peanuts. | ||
| - | can we use bone conduction to pick up chewing sounds and can we process and categorize them into something | + | {{: |
| - | ===articles=== | + | < |
| - | {{ :: | + | </ |
| - | {{ ::zampini2004.pdf |"THE ROLE OF AUDITORY CUES IN MODULATING THE PERCEIVED CRISPNESS AND STALENESS OF POTATO CHIPS"}}\\ | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | https://scholar.google.co.il/ | + | < |
| + | The experiments were conducted in a sound-proofed recording studio. Bone Conduction was recorded with a microphone Shadow 4001 (frequency band: | ||
| + | 80-15000 Hz) pressed firmly against the cheek of the subject, near the maxillar angle, on the eating side. Air-conduction was recorded with a microphone | ||
| + | AKG C414EB (frequency band: 20-20,000 Hz) held on the other side of the subject’s head. The diaphragm of the microphone was in front of the ear canal | ||
| + | opening at 8 cm. | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | {{ :pasted:20190117-161122.png?300}} | + | < |
| + | Participants were seated comfortably in a small sound-attenuated booth [...] A microphone (Sennheiser ME66/K6 supercardioid, | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:pasted:20190118-154431.png?400}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===articles=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *{{ :: | ||
| + | *{{ :: | ||
| + | *{{ :: | ||
| + | *{{ :: | ||
| + | *{{ :: | ||
| + | *{{ :: | ||
| + | *{{ :: | ||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| ===hardware=== | ===hardware=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| currently a homebrew pickup\piezo pickup microphone seems the best bet. | currently a homebrew pickup\piezo pickup microphone seems the best bet. | ||
| - | [[https:// | + | [[https:// |
| + | |||
| + | the [[https:// | ||
| === Audio Processing === | === Audio Processing === | ||
| [[https:// | [[https:// | ||